In German the subjunctive is called the Konjunktiv and there are two of them. Konjunktiv I—which is formed differently from its younger brother Konjunktiv II—is used chiefly for reporting indirect speech and old fashioned commands. Historians and journalists will be pleased to know there’s a mood in which they can really show off.
Konjunktiv II is where the magic happens. This mood, much as in English, gives you the ability to create hypothetical situations, express doubt over an idea and wish yourself into anything you want to be.
It’s by far the more commonly used of the two, and once you’ve cracked it, you’ll really be able to deepen your conversational skills. With the subjunctive you can express your desires that—up until now—the indicative “I want” has made rude or boring. This is where we’ll start.
Subjunctive II: “Shoulda, Woulda, Coulda”
Let’s take another look at this sentence:
If I could master the subjunctive, I wouldn’t be far off from mastering being human.
This is straight up Konjunktiv II. In fact, almost 100% of the times you see the words “should,” “would” or “could,” you’ll be knee deep in the subjunctive. In the example above, we are expressing the hypothetical notion of mastering the Subjunctive II and therefore the hypothetical notion of mastering being human. A leap of faith perhaps, but it serves our purpose.
The Subjunctive II also helps us to soften requests. In fact one of the first things you’ll have learned in German will have been how to order something in a restaurant. “I want” doesn’t get you there. But Ich möchte (I would like) or Ich hätte gerne (I would like to have), does very nicely. These are both examples of Konjunktiv II. They are expressions of desire, much like wishing, which is also used in the subjunctive mood.
Essentially, the subjunctive mood is used when there is an element of doubt or when something has not yet happened contained within the thought. Let’s have a look at some examples and work out how to form the Subjunctive II.
Rules and Application
Forming the Subjunctive II is much easier than you would think, and is done in two ways. One is the adaptation of the imperfect, and the other is with an auxiliary verb, werden (to become).
The most commonly used verbs used without the auxiliary are haben, sein and the modal verbs. In these cases, the verbs use the stem of their imperfect tense conjugation, but gain an umlaut and an “-e” if needed. For example:
haben – habe – hatte – hätte
sein – bin – war – wäre
mögen – mag – mochte – möchte
dürfen – darf – durfte – dürfte
können – kann – konnte – könnte
müssen – muss – musste – müsste
wollen – will – wollte – wollte (Q. Ummm, where’s the umlaut? A. Some verbs don’t take one)
sollen – soll – sollte – sollte (Q. Again, where’s that umlaut? A. Sorry.)
So you see, it’s pretty straight forward. Of course all verbs have a subjunctive form. And whether they’re irregular or regular, weak or strong, they are all formed from the stem of their imperfect conjugation.
gehen – gehe – ging – ginge
kaufen – kaufe – kaufte – kaufte
geben – gebe – gab – gäbe
essen – esse – aß – äße
You get the picture. But there’s a much, much easier way of getting a handle on Konjunktiv II and it’s with the verb werden.
While those first eight verbs we conjugated above don’t use it, every other verb you can think of can be used in the subjunctive with werden; which I guess right now is looking like a pretty special verb. If you know the subjunctive form of werden, then you know the subjunctive form of every other verb (except for those top eight, don’t forget them).
Here it is:
All you have to do now is add the infinitive and you’ve got yourself a verb in Konjunktiv II.
Wenn ich viel Geld hätte, würde ich eine Weltreise machen.
(If I had a lot of money, I would travel the world.)
Du würdest mich hier nicht alleine lassen, oder?
(You wouldn’t leave me alone here, would you?)
Nein, natürlich nicht, wir würden zusammen fliegen!
(No, not at all, we could fly together!)
Here we see the subjunctive mood being used firstly to express a desire dependent on a particular condition (having lots of money) as well as being used in a question which expresses a doubt or a negative (whether or not person B would be left by themselves). And finally the resolution, still in the subjunctive because the idea is still dependent on person A having enough money, which she doesn’t.
There is a great game to really nail this form of the subjunctive. In a group beginning with the idea “Wenn ich viel Geld hätte…,” one person goes on to create a scenario. So using the example above:
Wenn ich viel Geld hätte, würde ich eine Weltreise machen.
The next person uses this scenario to continue the story.
Wenn ich eine Weltreise machen würde, müsste ich meinen Hund zu Hause lassen.
(If I traveled the world, I would have to leave my dog at home.)
And so on…
Wenn ich meinen Hund zu Hause lassen müsste, wäre ich ganz traurig.
(If I had to leave my dog at home, I would be very sad.)
The Subjunctive II only works in two tenses. The “non-past,” as displayed above, and the indeterminate past. The reason these two are indeterminate is because of the unreal nature of the subjunctive. “If I had a lot of money I would travel the world” could relate to any time that has not yet occurred.
Similarly, the statement, “Had I worn warmer clothes, I wouldn’t have gotten sick” refers to a time in the past which is unreal. Using the past in Konjunktiv II is a tad trickier, but nothing to cause any kind of breakdown.
Using sein and haben in their subjunctive form as the auxiliaries, we simply add the past participle of the verb we want to be expressed in the subjunctive and voila:
Wenn ich mich wärmer angezogen hätte, wäre ich nicht krank geworden.
(Had I worn warmer clothes, I wouldn’t have gotten sick.)
And that’s it.
Subjunctive I: “That’s What She Said”
Subjunctive I is nowhere near as frequently used as Subjunctive II. Chiefly this mood is used in reported or indirect speech as a way of maintaining distance from the source. You’ll also find it cropping up in older forms of instructional manuals, cookbooks and the like, as well as general sayings, such as “Es Lebe der König” (long live the king) and “Gott sei Dank” (thank God).
Rules and Application
Forming Konjunktiv I is fairly straightforward. Whereas Konjunktiv II is formed from the stem of its imperfect conjugation, here we use the present tense stem and then add the same endings as with earlier.
Luckily for us, this applies to every verb save one, sein, which was always going to be doing something different, let’s face it.
Konjunktiv I forms of haben, leben, and gehen:
Ich mache, habe, lebe, gehe
du machest, habest, lebest, gehest,
er/sie/es mache, habe, lebe, gehe,
wir machen, haben, leben, gehen,
ihr machet, habet, lebet, gehet,
Sie/sie machen, haben, leben, gehen.
Konjunktiv I form of sein:
While this is a necessary skill to acquire if you’re looking to enhance your written German, I can’t stress enough how infrequently this mood is used outside of news reporting. Practice by identifying it in online newspaper reports and in no time you’ll be able to differentiate by what a person did and what a person is said to have done–good, huh?
Unlike Konjunktiv II, which has only two, Konjunktiv I has four tenses: present, past, future and future perfect. In these latter three, the rule is simple: The auxiliary verb is conjugated in Konjunktiv I.
Present: Er sagte, er habe kein Interesse. (He said he isn’t interested.)
Past: Er sagte, er sei nicht gegangen. (He said he didn’t go.)
Future: Er sagte, er werde es morgen machen. (He said, he will do it tomorrow.)
Future Perfect: Er sagte, er werde sich vor Montag entschuldigt haben. (He said he will have apologized before Monday.)
So there we are. The key to talking about being human, to talking about all your dreams and wishes, as well as being able to talk about someone else’s dreams and wishes, with the use of the German subjunctive mood. It may be a lot to take in, but the rewards of mastering it are huge. Good luck!